Change in Major of Mons

Ι also have not good opinion for DeFrancesco's targets.
I remember his blackmail in past for Greek situation.
But i believe that everyone can take part in a international tournament.
And i think that an ex-president and now candidate for the BoD must respect his opponents.

Fistf is over personal problems. We can fight with dialogue but decisions like "persona non grata" are not acceptable.
Last years i had problem with you Vincent. You and Heinz ban me (no the disciplinary council) no for my behaviour in halls but for political reasons.
The future proved that i have right. I thought that you been better after last year's election. I believed until yesterday that you can continue as communication director. But you did the same mistake. You confused the personal and political problems with the simple game.
I can understand you because many times i loose my mind after a fight. I prefer members of next BoD to have clean past without vendetas.

Maybe the represantives to have different opinion by me. We will inform in a month. But after every fight the split is closer...

Kostas, it's not a problem between you and me. it's a problem that someone is causing trouble in FISTF and is fighting against the unity of the movement. Since the meeting in Rotterdam and the famous "we don't want a world cup in Denmark and we'll do all we can to have the world cup somewhere else", FISTF has been in trouble because of a few people. It's realy time to get back to real values with honest people and to get rid of all trouble-makers. That I write publicly what I think is my problem. At least I won't be the kind of hypocrit who is destroying everything and then goes shaking hands to everybody during tournaments. That's the reality!

I never asked for a second chance, but as it seems it doesn't make sense to continue discussing here.

kechris wrote:

Heinz Eder wrote:
You are always talking about the past, if you read your posts and don't trust that people maybe learnt something and can do it better in future, that's what I meant when I wrote you don't give anybody a second chance, because you can't forget the past.

You failed as sport director. What change the last year? You were fan and assistant of the next sport director who also he failed. You didn't accept ever you mistakes in past. So why you asked a second chance?
I prefer to give a chance (if i vote) to Lenz to Luis Felippe or Drastis or Chragg or Vesa or Tilgner or Corsten or Lauder or Antonello or many others. Maybe if they took a chance to find a good director between all of them.
I thought that Vincent learnt by his mistakes. But he did a big one yesterday for DeFrancesco so i think that he will do more mistakes in future.
I prefer another candidate by Belgium. Maybe Vanton or other with good english.

Those are my personal opinions.

I think that the first think to expect from the new BOD is to close all the forums in the world .
those are the black peast !!!
REALLY

@indostar
That is what Catania and his Bod did
If you can't stand critics don't become a member of a Bod or manager or any leading funtion in general.

Not the forums are the problem, people are.

indostar wrote:I think that the first think to expect from the new BOD is to close all the forums in the world .
those are the black peast !!!
REALLY

Paradox! Dont use or write in it, if you think so.

Belphigor wrote:

indostar wrote:I think that the first think to expect from the new BOD is to close all the forums in the world .
those are the black peast !!!
REALLY

Paradox! Dont use or write in it, if you think so.

you reply shows Exactly what i mean !
Thanks

2 weeks to go before the best tournament on earth and it seems there will be less players than in the last few years, in particular not many Italians (!!!!!) and we still wonder why (?????)

Don't miss the chance to register!

Link: www.ashennuyer.be

A comment like that doesn't help anything.

As you know, and you have said before in other competitions, people make their own choices and participate when they think it's worth it. Everyone makes this decision themselves.

Maybe if there were less comments on the italian forum saying that "Mons is only the tournament with dirty lavatories", italian players would make a better opinion on what remains the best tournament of the year.

Admin wrote:Maybe if there were less comments on the italian forum saying that "Mons is only the tournament with dirty lavatories", italian players would make a better opinion on what remains the best tournament of the year.

I understand, but it is still their decision to make.

And I believe that the problems of FISTF and the infected relationships between countries (especially Italy and Belgium) have an effect on people with or without lavatories.

I just think that a positive text would work better. The truth seems that Mons "would appreciate if more italians would register". Why not write that instead...

Just saw the large number of entries to the Major of Mons especially in the categories Team, Open, Veterans and Ladies. Congratulation to Oli and the team of AS Hennuyer. And good to see also the italians coming. This is a strong signal

Could anyone tell me what happened with the idea which should be tested in Mons?
I heard that there should be the possibility to write 6 on the sheet and to make 2 changes in half-time. Will that be tested in Mons now or not?

From what is written in the invitation, yes.

Could this grow to a problem maybe?

No i don't think.
There is already a rule existing who has to make the first change in the half-time.
It is only a question of organization.
It could work like that.
Team A has to do the first substitution
Team B has the next
If team A wants to make a second one, they have to do next
Team B can choose if they want another substitution.

Thossa wrote:Could this grow to a problem maybe?

Attention:

The Sport Director asked me NOT to make the test of 2 substitutions. The usual rules will be used.

oli wrote:
The Sport Director asked me NOT to make the test of 2 substitutions. The usual rules will be used.

Nice to know you wanted to try this. I remember the subject being raised in the sports commission. It's a pity it will not be tested.

I'm also sorry for that. It could be a very interesting test, I was excited to make such a test and evaluate the results of it after the tournament.

von K. wrote:

oli wrote:
The Sport Director asked me NOT to make the test of 2 substitutions. The usual rules will be used.

Nice to know you wanted to try this. I remember the subject being raised in the sports commission. It's a pity it will not be tested.

Any result from the international matches between Austria and Belgium (Open and Vet categories ?)

There are lots of different possible variations for the substitution rule. Plainly adding another substitution is just one of them. They would certainly increase the tactical side of the team game, if it is seen as positive development.

Heinz Eder wrote:I'm also sorry for that. It could be a very interesting test, I was excited to make such a test and evaluate the results of it after the tournament.

von K. wrote:

oli wrote:
The Sport Director asked me NOT to make the test of 2 substitutions. The usual rules will be used.

Nice to know you wanted to try this. I remember the subject being raised in the sports commission. It's a pity it will not be tested.